| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ... |
| Date: | 2004-03-09 06:36:27 |
| Message-ID: | 21413.1078814187@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> If "NOWAIT" is the choice, I could live with it. If there's no
>> objection, I will go with "NOWAIT", not "NO WAIT".
> How about "WITHOUT WAIT", which is like many of our other commands?
The first question in my mind is "exactly how does Oracle spell this?"
Let's not go inventing compatible-with-no-one syntax if we don't have to.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hans-Jürgen Schönig | 2004-03-09 06:41:44 | Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ... |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-03-09 06:34:24 | Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hans-Jürgen Schönig | 2004-03-09 06:41:44 | Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ... |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-03-09 06:34:24 | Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ... |