Re: On hardcoded type aliases and typmod for user types

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: On hardcoded type aliases and typmod for user types
Date: 2005-09-01 16:08:55
Message-ID: 21187.1125590935@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 08:50:27AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> varchar could do something like using 24 bits for the length
>> and 8 bits for an encoded indication of the charset.

> With the unfortunate effect that strings are limited to 16Mb instead of
> 1Gb.

No, only that you can't declare a specific maxlength for a varchar that
exceeds 16Mb ... and guess what, there is already a smaller limit than
that, on the grounds that if a user writes varchar(1000000000) he needs
a cluebat anyway. I think you might have momentarily confused typmod
with the varlena length word of an individual value.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2005-09-01 16:09:59 Re: Minimally avoiding Transaction Wraparound in VLDBs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-09-01 16:03:24 Re: TODO item: set proper permissions on non-system schemas