Re: pg_upgrade improvements

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Harold Giménez <harold(dot)gimenez(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade improvements
Date: 2012-04-05 03:56:59
Message-ID: 21153.1333598219@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> The single-user option *sounds* viable, but, iirc, it actually isn't due
> to the limitations on what can be done in that mode.

Yeah. IMO the right long-term fix is to be able to run pg_dump and psql
talking to a standalone backend, but nobody's gotten round to making
that possible.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2012-04-05 06:00:49 Re: Question regarding SSL code in backend and frontend
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2012-04-05 02:58:46 Re: pg_upgrade improvements