Re: It's June 1; do you know where your release is?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: It's June 1; do you know where your release is?
Date: 2009-06-01 18:17:44
Message-ID: 20871.1243880264@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> # cost_nestloop and cost_hashjoin are broken for SEMI and ANTI joins
> * tgl says: I think this is mostly dealt with but it could use performance testing.

> Mark? Jignesh? Can you test this?

Actually I'm hoping that Kevin Grittner will have something to report
on that one soon --- he's our best test case for complicated EXISTS
queries. I doubt that the standard benchmarks exercise this code
meaningfully at all.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2009-06-01 18:24:14 Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-06-01 18:17:08 Re: It's June 1; do you know where your release is?