From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs, updated patch |
Date: | 2007-02-05 21:40:41 |
Message-ID: | 20509.1170711641@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> BTW, I don't care much for the terminology "phantom cid" ... there's
>>> nothing particularly "phantom" about them, seeing they get onto disk.
>>> Can anyone think of a better name? The best I can do offhand is
>>> "merged cid" or "cid pair", which aren't inspiring.
>>
>> MultiCid, like the MultiXacts? Maybe not, they're quite different beasts...
> Dual cid? Double cid?
"Double cid" doesn't sound too bad. Another thought that just came to
mind is "cid interval" or some variant of that.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-02-05 22:11:42 | Re: Referential Integrity and SHARE locks |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-02-05 19:44:38 | Re: [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs, updated patch |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-02-05 22:40:54 | Re: [BUGS] BUG #2221: Bad delimiters allowed in COPY ... |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2007-02-05 20:53:31 | Re: TM formating patch |