Re: Extensions, this time with a patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extensions, this time with a patch
Date: 2010-10-19 15:45:30
Message-ID: 20336.1287503130@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Only if the script is intentionally noisy. The right fix here is
>> probably to bump up the min message level while running the script.

> You mean doing that from the SQL script itself (using SET) or in the
> pg_execute_from_file() code? My guess is the former, but...

You could argue that either way I guess. The script knows what it
needs, but OTOH just about every extension there is will probably
be generating useless NOTICEs unless something is done, so maybe
the extension management code should take care of it for them.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-10-19 15:48:46 Re: Simplifying replication
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2010-10-19 15:43:31 Re: knngist - 0.8