| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
| Cc: | Luca Ferrari <fluca1978(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: could not read block 0 in file : read only 0 of 8192 bytes when doing nasty on immutable index function |
| Date: | 2018-07-25 23:03:24 |
| Message-ID: | 20180725230324.4omqinhklezfvmlc@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-general |
Hi,
On 2018-07-09 12:06:21 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > I assume we'll have to backpatch this issue, so I think it'd probably a
> > good idea to put a specific CacheInvalidateHeapTuple() in there
> > explicitly in the back branches, and do the larger fix in 12. ISTM
> > there's some risks that it'd cause issues. Will you tackle this?
>
> Okay.
Any progress on that?
Peter, given that your patch made this more likely, and that you're a
committer these days, I'm opening an open items entry, and assign it to
you. Does that sound ok?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-07-25 23:17:19 | Re: could not read block 0 in file : read only 0 of 8192 bytes when doing nasty on immutable index function |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-07-25 22:59:51 | Re: LLVM jit and matview |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-07-25 23:17:19 | Re: could not read block 0 in file : read only 0 of 8192 bytes when doing nasty on immutable index function |
| Previous Message | Dimitri Maziuk | 2018-07-25 19:38:27 | Re: logical replication snapshots |