Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Date: 2018-05-24 18:30:30
Message-ID: 20180524183030.GC19701@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 02:23:17PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2018-May-24, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 07:49:42PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
>
> > > I toss my +1 to removing it altogether.
> >
> > +1 We are terrible at removing old GUCs and having it around means
> > everyone has to decide if they need to change it, so having it is not a
> > zero cost.
>
> Are you voting to remove the GUC?

Yes. Sorry but I am very late on this and maybe too late to vote.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-05-24 18:46:12 Re: Unexpected casts while using date_trunc()
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-05-24 18:23:17 Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?