| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Online enabling of checksums |
| Date: | 2018-04-05 20:14:54 |
| Message-ID: | 20180405201454.oyxaagn3bk4gdymu@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-04-05 13:12:08 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-04-05 22:06:36 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > I have now pushed this latest version with some minor text adjustments and
> > a catversion bump.
> >
> > Thanks for all the reviews!
>
> I want to be on the record that I think merging a nontrival feature that
> got submitted 2018-02-21, just before the start of the last last CF, is
> an abuse of process, and not cool. We've other people working hard to
> follow the process, and circumventing it like this just signals to
> people trying to follow the rules that they're fools.
>
> Merging ~2kloc patches like that is going to cause pain. And even if
> not, it causes procedual damage.
And even worse, without even announcing an intent to commit and giving
people a chance to object.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2018-04-05 20:20:52 | Re: Online enabling of checksums |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-04-05 20:12:08 | Re: Online enabling of checksums |