Re: walsender & parallelism

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: walsender & parallelism
Date: 2017-06-03 03:39:15
Message-ID: 20170603033915.4ocjvvacpg6wntvo@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-06-02 23:27:55 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 5/31/17 23:54, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On 5/29/17 22:01, Noah Misch wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 01:45:59PM -0400, Andres Freund wrote:
> >>> On May 23, 2017 1:42:41 PM EDT, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> so this didn't really move anywhere AFAICS, do we think the approach
> >>>> I've chosen is good or do we want to do something else here?
> >>>
> >>> Can you add it to the open items list?
> >>
> >> [Action required within three days. This is a generic notification.]
> >
> > I have posted an update. The next update will be Friday.
>
> Andres is now working on this. Let's give him a bit of time. ;-)

Yep.

I've posted patches for most things in this thread over at
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20170603002023.rcppadggfiaav377%40alap3.anarazel.de
because the proper fixes here are only possible after resolving the
discussion there. The only thing I know of that's going remaining
afterwards is SIGHUP handling, of which there's already a patch in this
thread (although I want to prune its scope before committing).

I suspect that the review for those will probably happen over the next
few days, I plan to push those afterwards.

- Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2017-06-03 04:58:40 Re: Server ignores contents of SASLInitialResponse
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-06-03 03:27:55 Re: walsender & parallelism