Re: Logical replication in the same cluster

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Logical replication in the same cluster
Date: 2017-05-02 14:37:27
Message-ID: 20170502143727.smgn2oxou4yjma3f@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-05-02 09:17:27 +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> Yes because otherwise we risk leaving slot on the upstream if the
> command fails downstream.

Shouldn't temporary slots be able to solve that concern? Create it as
temporary at the beginning, mark it as permanent at the end?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2017-05-02 14:44:33 Re: CTE inlining
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-05-02 14:37:07 Re: Concurrent ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART Regression