Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test
Date: 2017-04-03 15:12:37
Message-ID: 20170403151237.GK9812@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Craig, Michael,

* Craig Ringer (craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> On 3 April 2017 at 21:07, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I am parking that in the next commit fest.
>
> Great.
>
> Count me in as reviewer, and feel free to poke me if I get caught up
> in other things.

I'm interested in this also.

> I'd like to see us adopting TAP for cross-version stuff in pg_dump etc
> too, down the track.

I'm very curious what you're thinking here? IIRC, Andrew had some ideas
for how to do true cross-version testing with TAP in the buildfarm, but
I don't think we actually have that yet..?

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-04-03 15:18:39 Re: Fix slot name change handling for subscriptions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-04-03 15:06:36 Re: Unable to build doc on latest head