Re: WIP: Faster Expression Processing v4

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: Faster Expression Processing v4
Date: 2017-03-15 03:20:57
Message-ID: 20170315032057.wtwsqblmxmlsvvj6@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-03-14 23:10:25 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 3/14/17 19:40, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Any idea why we introduce __ stuff?
>
> Because the symbols start with an underscore:
>
> /* Define to 1 if your compiler understands _Static_assert. */
> #undef HAVE__STATIC_ASSERT

Oh, I guess that makes some sense. But we do so very inconsistently,
given we only keep the leading underscores not the trailing ones (see
HAVE__VA_ARGS, HAVE_FUNCNAME__FUNC).

> But we don't need to introduce underscores that are not there.

Indeed. Don't want to repost for just this, but consider it adapted
(and moved as requested by Tom).

- Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-03-15 03:23:48 Re: WIP: Faster Expression Processing v4
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-03-15 03:10:25 Re: WIP: Faster Expression Processing v4