Re: PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, John Gorman <johngorman2(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators
Date: 2017-02-27 17:00:09
Message-ID: 20170227170009.pr2hlyyf4yjp4kjg@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2017-02-27 17:56:08 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> No, I don't, but I'll ping Craig. I might ping him, but it's ~4AM in
> Australia, though, so it'll take time.

Did the same... ;)

> FWIW I think the ppc64 machines are failing because of unrelated issue
> (changes to integer timestamps). We should probably look at 32bit machines
> first.

Don't think so - termite is ppc64 afaics, and the failure doesn't look
integer timestamp related (assert failure is clearly about this, and set
of changed commits *only* include slab related commits).

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2017-02-27 17:04:41 Re: PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2017-02-27 16:56:08 Re: PATCH: two slab-like memory allocators