| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shay Rojansky <roji(at)roji(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Slowness of extended protocol |
| Date: | 2016-08-10 16:06:20 |
| Message-ID: | 20160810160620.GI4028@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Vladimir Sitnikov (sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> It works completely transparent to the application, and it does use
> server-prepared statements even though application builds "brand new" sql
> text every time.
And is the source of frequent complaints on various mailing lists along
the lines of "why did my query suddently get slow the 6th time it was
run?!".
I encourage you to look through the archives and read up on how and why
that can happen.
Thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-08-10 16:07:43 | Re: Is there a way around function search_path killing SQL function inlining? |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2016-08-10 16:04:19 | Re: Proposal for CSN based snapshots |