Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal
Date: 2016-05-17 01:59:27
Message-ID: 20160517015927.GA127080@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 05/16/2016 06:32 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> >>Alvaro,
> >>
> >>Thank you for bringing this to light. Is there a contributor FAQ for
> >>PgLogical so that people can help?
> >
> >Hmm, I don't think there's any contributor FAQ. It's supposed to be a
> >regular patch submission, after all -- it needs user interface review, a
> >review of the communication protocol, tests, code-level review, etc.
>
> O.k. so we should discuss all PgLogical things here and not on Github? I am
> just trying to figure out what the proper mode here is. I don't think
> anybody wants us to double up efforts.

As far as I am concerned, by all means ignore Github and discuss issues
in pgsql-hackers. Github is being used only because it provides a
convenient Git mirror, which is said to be easier to use than attaching
huge patches back and forth. I think it may be more convenient also to
keep track of issues people have reported so that they can be marked as
fixed in commit messages, etc.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2016-05-17 05:45:09 Re: 10.0
Previous Message David Fetter 2016-05-17 01:48:27 Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal