Re: kqueue

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Subject: Re: kqueue
Date: 2016-04-22 22:29:07
Message-ID: 20160422222907.utxwpkhgyixpdwnu@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-04-22 19:25:06 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Since we haven't, maybe nobody cares, so why should we?

I guess it's to a good degree because netbsd has pg packages, and it's
fixed there?

> would rename our function nonetheless FWIW; the name seems far too
> generic to me.

Yea.

> pg_strtoi?

I think that's what Thomas did upthread. Are you taking this one then?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

  • Re: kqueue at 2016-04-22 22:25:06 from Alvaro Herrera

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-04-22 22:35:44 Re: kqueue
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-04-22 22:27:48 Re: kqueue