Re: parallel query vs extensions

From: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parallel query vs extensions
Date: 2016-04-19 02:56:23
Message-ID: 20160419025623.GB1984253@tornado.leadboat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:56:28AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:45 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Should every relevant contrib extension get a version bump with a
> > transition file which is nothing but a list of "alter function blah
> > blah blah parallel safe" ?
>
> Yes, I think that's what we would need to do. It's a lot of work,
> albeit mostly mechanical.

This is in the open items list, but I think it is too late to include such a
change in 9.6. This is an opportunity for further optimization, not a defect.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2016-04-19 03:16:51 Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW
Previous Message Noah Misch 2016-04-19 02:49:50 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add trigonometric functions that work in degrees.