Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches

From: "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ildus Kurbangaliev <i(dot)kurbangaliev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches
Date: 2016-01-05 15:42:24
Message-ID: 20160105154224.GB7650@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016-01-05 10:40:13 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 04:31:15PM +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2016-01-05 10:28:25 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Yes? But it's ok sizewise on the common platforms?
>
> What is the uncommon part? I guess I missed that.

http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20151212181702.GH17938%40alap3.anarazel.de

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2016-01-05 15:48:43 Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2016-01-05 15:40:13 Re: [PATCH] Refactoring of LWLock tranches