Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Additional role attributes && superuser review
Date: 2016-01-04 04:25:11
Message-ID: 20160104042511.GU3685@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Michael Paquier (michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> > I could go either way on that, really. I don't find namespace to be
> > confusing when used in that way, but I'll change it since others do.
>
> It seems to me that the way patch does it is fine..

Alright, fair enough.

Thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-01-04 04:26:35 Re: 9.5 BLOCKER: regrole and regnamespace and quotes
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2016-01-04 04:25:04 Re: 9.5 BLOCKER: regrole and regnamespace and quotes