Re: checkpointer continuous flushing

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: checkpointer continuous flushing
Date: 2015-09-09 19:12:32
Message-ID: 20150909191232.GA12694@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-09-09 20:56:15 +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> As I wrote before, FreeBSD would be a good candidate because the
> posix_fadvise seems much more reasonable than on Linux, and should be
> profitable, so it would be a pity to remove it.

Why do you think it's different on fbsd? Also, why is it unreasonable
that DONNEED removes stuff from the cache?

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2015-09-09 19:29:12 Re: checkpointer continuous flushing
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-09-09 19:00:10 Latent cache flush hazard in RelationInitIndexAccessInfo