| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Gradek <mike(at)busbud(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #13440: unaccent does not remove all diacritics |
| Date: | 2015-09-02 23:54:35 |
| Message-ID: | 20150902235435.GA17210@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 2015-09-02 19:33:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > On 2015-09-02 19:23:11 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> FWIW, I wasn't sure we had consensus to commit this at all; if I had
> >> thought that I would've done so back in June.
>
> > There seemed to be nobody really arguing against fixing it in master and
> > several people on board with it?
>
> I think it would be good to have a discussion someplace more widely read
> than the -bugs list. -hackers or -general would be the place to find
> out if this sort of change is widely acceptable.
I'm fine with doing that - but my impression from this thread was that
the only thing we're unsure about is wether to backpatch this change?
Weren't you pretty close to backpatching it?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-09-02 23:59:37 | Re: BUG #13440: unaccent does not remove all diacritics |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-09-02 23:33:00 | Re: BUG #13440: unaccent does not remove all diacritics |