Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean
Date: 2015-08-12 23:09:50
Message-ID: 20150812230950.GE21836@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-08-12 19:03:50 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> The adjacent code is doing something different than a bit-test, though:
> it's checking whether multibit fields have particular values.

Yea, I know, that's why I was on the fence about it. Since you have an
opinion and I couldn't really decide it's pretty clear which direction
to go ;)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-08-12 23:11:36 Re: count_nulls(VARIADIC "any")
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-08-12 23:03:50 Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean