Re: 9.5alpha1: Partial index not used

From: "Peter J(dot) Holzer" <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Peter J(dot) Holzer" <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 9.5alpha1: Partial index not used
Date: 2015-08-01 20:41:02
Message-ID: 20150801204102.GB18043@hjp.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 2015-08-01 14:33:50 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Peter J. Holzer" <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at> writes:
> > On 2015-07-31 20:03:41 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I agree that it'd be better if they all did, but I'm disinclined to
> >> consider it a bug fix unless you can show a specific case in which
> >> there's a performance regression from older releases.
>
> > "grossly incorrect plan choices are cause for a bug report" (from
> > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/indexes-partial.html) ;-)
>
> Sorry, I phrased that poorly. I meant that I'm disinclined to change
> this behavior in stable branches unless it's a regression. I agree
> that it's reasonable to fix it in 9.5/HEAD, and I've now done so.

Cool, thanks!

hp

--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | I want to forget all about both belts and
|_|_) | | suspenders; instead, I want to buy pants
| | | hjp(at)hjp(dot)at | that actually fit.
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | -- http://noncombatant.org/

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2015-08-02 02:54:37 Re: Missing file versions for a bunch of dll/exe files in Windows builds
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-08-01 18:33:50 Re: 9.5alpha1: Partial index not used