| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit |
| Date: | 2015-03-09 16:47:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20150309164707.GA22823@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> JD sees the situation correctly: this is $dayjob work, and it's going
> to get done now not in four months because I have a deadline to meet.
> I would like to push it into the community sources to reduce divergence
> between our copy and Salesforce's, but if I'm told it has to wait till
> 9.6, I may or may not remember to try to do something then.
I think most of the committers are pretty much in that situation?
> I will admit that I'm been slacking on commitfest work. This is not
> unrelated to the fact that we've been in commitfest mode continuously
> since last August. I'm afraid whatever enthusiasm I had for reviewing
> other peoples' patches burned out some time ago.
I can certainly relate to that :(.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-03-09 16:50:03 | Re: File based Incremental backup v8 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-03-09 16:41:18 | Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit |