From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Arthur Silva <arthurprs(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: logical column ordering |
Date: | 2015-02-27 20:01:22 |
Message-ID: | 20150227200122.GW24199@awork2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-02-27 16:51:30 -0300, Arthur Silva wrote:
> Sorry to intrude, I've been following this post and I was wondering if it
> would allow (in the currently planed form or in the future) a wider set of
> non-rewriting DDLs to Postgres.
I don't think it makes a big difference.
> For example, drop a column without rewriting the table.
That's already possible.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-02-27 20:02:58 | Re: logical column ordering |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2015-02-27 20:00:35 | Re: remove pg_standby? |