| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Alex Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs |
| Date: | 2015-01-16 12:45:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20150116124548.GB16991@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-01-16 21:43:43 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> > I have written similar logic, and while it's not pleasant, it's doable.
> > This issue would really only go away if you don't use a file to signal
> > recovery at all, which you have argued for, but which is really a
> > separate and more difficult problem.
> Moving this patch to the next CF and marking it as returned with
> feedback for current CF as there is visibly no consensus reached.
I don't think that's a good idea. If we defer this another couple months
we'l *never* reach anything coming close to concensus.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-01-16 12:50:16 | Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-01-16 12:43:43 | Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs |