| From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CATUPDATE confusion? |
| Date: | 2014-12-27 23:31:50 |
| Message-ID: | 20141227233150.GA2046947@tornado.leadboat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 06:26:02PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> > * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> >> Plan C (remove CATUPDATE altogether) also has some merit. But adding a
> >> superuser override there would be entirely pointless.
>
> > This is be my recommendation. I do not see the point of carrying the
> > option around just to confuse new users of pg_authid and reviewers of
> > the code.
>
> Yeah ... if no one's found it interesting in the 20 years since the
> code left Berkeley, it's unlikely that interest will emerge in the
> future.
No objection here.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2014-12-27 23:46:51 | Re: Initdb-cs_CZ.WIN-1250 buildfarm failures |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-12-27 23:26:02 | Re: CATUPDATE confusion? |