| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgbench -f and vacuum |
| Date: | 2014-12-22 17:38:12 |
| Message-ID: | 20141222173812.GG1768@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tomas Vondra wrote:
> I'm not objecting to prototypes in general, but I believe the principle
> is to respect how the existing code is written. There are almost no
> other prototypes in pgbench.c - e.g. there are no prototypes for
> executeStatement(), init() etc. so adding the prototypes in this patch
> seems inconsistent. But maybe that's nitpicking.
Well, given that Tatsuo-san invented pgbench in the first place, I think
he has enough authority to decide whether to add prototypes or not.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-12-22 17:41:40 | Re: pgbench -f and vacuum |
| Previous Message | Fabrízio de Royes Mello | 2014-12-22 17:23:07 | Re: Proposal "VACUUM SCHEMA" |