| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Commitfest problems |
| Date: | 2014-12-11 21:07:52 |
| Message-ID: | 20141211210752.GG19832@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 03:47:29PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 12/11/14 1:35 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I have heard repeated concerns about the commitfest process in the past
> > few months. The fact we have been in a continual commitfest since
> > August also is concerning.
>
> I realized the other day, I'm embracing the idea of a continual commitfest.
>
> I'm still working on patches from the last commitfest. Why not? They
> didn't expire. Sure, it would have been nicer to get them done sooner,
> but what are you gonna do? The fact that Nov 15 < now < Dec 15 isn't
> going to change the fact that I have a few hours to spare right now and
> the patches are still relevant.
>
> As far as I'm concerned, we might as well just have one commitfest per
> major release. Call it a patch list. Make the list sortable by created
> date and last-updated date, and let the system police itself. At least
> that's honest.
Wow, that's radical, and interesting.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ Everyone has their own god. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2014-12-11 21:12:30 | Re: Commitfest problems |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-12-11 21:05:49 | Re: 9.5 release scheduling (was Re: logical column ordering) |