Re: 9.5 release scheduling (was Re: logical column ordering)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Phil Currier <pcurrier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: 9.5 release scheduling (was Re: logical column ordering)
Date: 2014-12-11 19:52:03
Message-ID: 20141211195203.GN1768@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

> That's one thought. Robert said the same thing about when he was the
> commitfest manager; he just reviewed most the patches himself in the end.
> And you mentioned that Tom used to review 70% of all incoming patches. How
> about we make that official? It's the commitfest manager's duty to review
> all the patches. He can recruit others if he can, but at the end of the day
> he's expected to take a look at every patch, and commit or return with some
> feedback.
>
> The problem with that is that we'll have a hard time to find volunteers for
> that. But we only need to find one sucker for each commitfest. I can
> volunteer to do that once a year; if the other active committers do the
> same, we're covered.

Hm, I was commitfest manager once, too, and this exact same thing
happened. Maybe we need to make that official, and give the sucker some
perk.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-12-11 19:56:07 Re: 9.5 release scheduling (was Re: logical column ordering)
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2014-12-11 19:51:31 Re: PATCH: hashjoin - gracefully increasing NTUP_PER_BUCKET instead of batching