Re: Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gilles Darold <gilles(dot)darold(at)dalibo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS
Date: 2014-11-14 15:54:30
Message-ID: 20141114155430.GX28859@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Noah Misch (noah(at)leadboat(dot)com) wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 08:35:25AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Personally, I'm leaning towards the first as it's less clutter in the
> > output of psql.
>
> I'd agree for a new design, but I see too little to gain from changing it now.
> Today's behavior is fine.

To clarify- you mean with the changes described- using usesuper for
rolreplication and rolbypassrls instead of 'false' when dumping from
older versions, correct?

Note for all- rolreplication goes back to 9.1. Are we thinking that
change should be backpatched?

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-11-14 16:24:20 Re: Re: Segmentation fault in pg_dumpall from master down to 9.1 and other bug introduced by RLS
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-11-14 15:02:08 Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0