Re: Inconsistencies in documentation of row-level locking

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Inconsistencies in documentation of row-level locking
Date: 2014-11-13 17:47:45
Message-ID: 20141113174745.GG1791@alvin.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Currently all the row-level lock modes are described in the page for
> SELECT query:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/explicit-locking.html#LOCKING-ROWS
> However, after browsing the documentation, I noticed in the page
> describing all the explicit locks of the system that there is a
> portion dedicated to row-level locks and this section is not
> mentioning at all FOR KEY SHARE and FOR NO KEY UPDATE.

Thanks, I applied it to master and 9.4 after some slight
editorialization.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-11-13 17:50:28 Re: Doing better at HINTing an appropriate column within errorMissingColumn()
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-11-13 17:39:39 Re: controlling psql's use of the pager a bit more