Re: pg_background (and more parallelism infrastructure patches)

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_background (and more parallelism infrastructure patches)
Date: 2014-10-29 19:07:06
Message-ID: 20141029190706.GE17790@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-10-29 15:00:36 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> 1. Does anyone strongly object to that course of action?

I don't.

> 2. Does anyone wish to argue for or against back-patching the name
> changes to 9.4?

+1.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2014-10-29 19:09:25 Re: lag_until_you_get_something() OVER () window function
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-10-29 19:00:36 Re: pg_background (and more parallelism infrastructure patches)