| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Directory/File Access Permissions for COPY and Generic File Access Functions |
| Date: | 2014-10-28 13:27:40 |
| Message-ID: | 20141028132740.GK2639@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-10-28 09:24:18 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> > There is absolutely NOT consensus on
> > this design or anything close to it.
>
> There is no doubt that consensus on the desirability and design needs
> to be reached before we can even consider committing it. I suspect
> Adam posted it simply because he had identified issues himself and
> wanted to make others aware that things had been fixed.
>
> That said, it sounds like the primary concern has been if we want this
> feature at all and there hasn't been much discussion of the design
> itself.
Well, why waste time on the technical details when we haven't agreed
that the feature is worthwile? Review bandwidth is a serious problem in
this community.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2014-10-28 13:31:14 | Re: [WIP Patch] Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-10-28 13:24:57 | Re: [WIP Patch] Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates |