Re: On partitioning

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: On partitioning
Date: 2014-10-28 12:23:43
Message-ID: 20141028122343.GI2639@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-10-28 08:19:36 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > In my opinion we can reuse (some of) the existing logic for INHERITS to
> > implement "proper" partitioning, but that should be an implementation
> > detail.
>
> Sure, that would be a sensible way to do it. I mostly care about not
> throwing out all the work that's been done on the planner and
> executor.

In that ase I'm not sure if there's actual disagreement here.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2014-10-28 12:25:37 Re: tracking commit timestamps
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-10-28 12:20:06 Re: Trailing comma support in SELECT statements