From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: On partitioning |
Date: | 2014-10-28 12:23:43 |
Message-ID: | 20141028122343.GI2639@awork2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-10-28 08:19:36 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > In my opinion we can reuse (some of) the existing logic for INHERITS to
> > implement "proper" partitioning, but that should be an implementation
> > detail.
>
> Sure, that would be a sensible way to do it. I mostly care about not
> throwing out all the work that's been done on the planner and
> executor.
In that ase I'm not sure if there's actual disagreement here.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2014-10-28 12:25:37 | Re: tracking commit timestamps |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2014-10-28 12:20:06 | Re: Trailing comma support in SELECT statements |