Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Date: 2014-10-14 21:24:13
Message-ID: 20141014212413.GF7043@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


It seems we left this in broken state. Do we need to do more here to
fix narwhal, or do we want to retire narwhal now? Something else? Are
we waiting on someone in particular to do something specific?

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-10-14 21:53:10 Re: WIP: dynahash replacement for buffer table
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2014-10-14 20:57:29 Re: proposal: plpgsql - Assert statement