Re: Obsolete comment within execTuples.c

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Obsolete comment within execTuples.c
Date: 2014-10-13 20:55:06
Message-ID: 20141013205506.GM21267@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 09:15:30PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > More generally, though, it seems like the header comments in execTuples.c
> > are not the best place to document global behavior ...
>
>
> Yeah, my thoughts exactly.

I applied the attached patch to at least clean up the breakage.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

Attachment Content-Type Size
exec.diff text/x-diff 1.2 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-10-13 21:17:54 Re: pg_dump refactor patch to remove global variables
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2014-10-13 20:31:51 Re: Missing IPv6 for pgbuildfarm.org