Re: BUG #10680: LDAP bind password leaks to log on failed authentication

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Steven Siebert <smsiebe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #10680: LDAP bind password leaks to log on failed authentication
Date: 2014-10-13 15:25:52
Message-ID: 20141013152552.GX21267@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 03:42:10PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> The right problem to be solving, to my mind, is that you feel a need
> to give access to the postmaster log to untrusted people. Now maybe
> that's just a problem of wrong administrative procedures, but let's
> consider what we might do in PG to improve your ability to do that
> safely. Perhaps what we should be entertaining is a proposal to have
> multiple log channels, some containing more security-relevant messages
> and others less so. Then you could give people the ability to read only
> the non-security-relevant messages. If we arranged for *all* messages
> relevant to pg_hba.conf to go into a secure log, it'd be a lot easier to
> convince ourselves that we would not leak any security-critical info
> than if we take the approach this patch proposes.

Uh, are we ready to output pg_hba.conf syntax errors (that might contain
passwords) to the that security channel? That seems confusing too. :-(

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-10-13 18:48:13 Re: BUG #10680: LDAP bind password leaks to log on failed authentication
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-10-13 14:04:41 Re: BUG #11660: TSVector not returning partial match on word "out"