Re: multixact optimization patches

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: multixact optimization patches
Date: 2014-10-11 21:31:52
Message-ID: 20141011213152.GL21267@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 03:56:19PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I have just pushed two optimization patches for multixacts to HEAD only.
> I hesitate to backpatch them to 9.3 right away, but will consider doing
> so if people think differently.
>
> I also have a patch that supposedly fixes the performance regression
> reported in bug #8470, but it's considerably more obscure so I'm not
> pushing it right now. It's attached. I'd need to spend some more time
> with it to ensure it doesn't break other cases before pushing. I know
> some people is interested in this fix and thought I'd throw it out there
> to gather some input.
>
> Since it affects much of the same code as the two patches I just pushed,
> using it in 9.3 requires cherry-picking those patches, but they apply
> without conflicts so it should be easy.

Wow, this is some very complex code. Are you closer to a decision on it?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ Everyone has their own god. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-10-11 21:41:47 Re: No toast table for pg_shseclabel but for pg_seclabel
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2014-10-11 21:25:31 Re: split builtins.h to quote.h