| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, "Brightwell, Adam" <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: replicating DROP commands across servers |
| Date: | 2014-10-03 17:08:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20141003170836.GN28859@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro,
* Alvaro Herrera (alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> There are three fixmes in the code. One can be handled by just removing
> the line; we don't really care about duplicating 10 lines of boilerplate
> code. The other two mean missing support for domain constraints and for
> default ACLs. Is there absolutely no feedback to be had on the
> mechanism used by the patch?
>
> Since the patch has had good feedback and no further comments arise, I
> can just implement support for those two missing object types and push,
> and everybody will be happy. Right?
In general, I'd say yes, but I'll take a look at the patch now and
provide feedback in a couple hours anyway.
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-10-03 17:09:28 | Re: test_shm_mq failing on anole (was: Sending out a request for more buildfarm animals?) |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2014-10-03 17:02:09 | Re: replicating DROP commands across servers |