| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kalyanov Dmitry <kalyanov(dot)dmitry(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Anonymous code block with parameters |
| Date: | 2014-09-18 11:53:59 |
| Message-ID: | 20140918115359.GZ25887@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-09-18 13:51:56 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2014-09-18 13:48 GMT+02:00 Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
>
> > On 2014-09-18 13:44:47 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > Isn't being able to do this on a standby a fundamental enough advantage?
> > Being significantly cheaper? Needing fewer roundtrips?
> >
>
> no, I don't need more. My opinion is, so this proposal has no real benefit,
> but will do implement redundant functionality.
FFS: What's redundant about being able to do this on a standby?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2014-09-18 11:59:20 | Re: Anonymous code block with parameters |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2014-09-18 11:51:56 | Re: Anonymous code block with parameters |