Re: Collations and Replication; Next Steps

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pg(at)heroku(dot)com, obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, mkelly(at)tripadvisor(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, mspilich(at)tripadvisor(dot)com
Subject: Re: Collations and Replication; Next Steps
Date: 2014-09-18 11:25:55
Message-ID: 20140918112555.GA24527@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 01:35:10PM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> In my understanding PostgreSQL's manual MUST include the ICU license
> term (this is not a problem). What I am not so sure is, any software
> uses PostgreSQL also MUST include the ICU license or not. If yes, I
> think this is surely a problem.

Only if we're thinking of distributing it. If the user gets ICU from
their distribution then there is no need to list the licence (just like
we don't need to mention the licence of glibc). We only need link
against it, not distribute it.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> He who writes carelessly confesses thereby at the very outset that he does
> not attach much importance to his own thoughts.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2014-09-18 11:35:32 Re: Anonymous code block with parameters
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2014-09-18 10:54:38 Re: proposal (9.5) : psql unicode border line styles