Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Baker, Keith [OCDUS Non-J&J]" <KBaker9(at)its(dot)jnj(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL
Date: 2014-08-20 23:33:38
Message-ID: 20140820233338.GA21584@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-07-25 18:29:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > * QNX lacks sigaction SA_RESTART: I modified "src/include/port.h" to define macros to retry system calls upon EINTR (open,read,write,...) when compiled on QNX
>
> That's pretty scary too. For one thing, such macros would affect every
> call site whether it's running with SA_RESTART or not. Do you really
> need it? It looks to me like we just turn off HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS if
> you don't have SA_RESTART. Maybe that code has bit-rotted by now, but
> it did work at one time.

I have pretty much no trust that we're maintaining
!HAVE_POSIX_SIGNAL. And none that we have that capability of doing so. I
seriously doubt there's any !HAVE_POSIX_SIGNAL animals and
873ab97219caabeb2f7b390268a4fe01e2b7518c makes it pretty darn unlikely
that we have much chance of finding such mistakes during development.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2014-08-20 23:35:17 Re: Verbose output of pg_dump not show schema name
Previous Message Claudio Freire 2014-08-20 23:33:20 Re: [PATCH] Incremental backup: add backup profile to base backup