Re: SKIP LOCKED DATA (work in progress)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <munro(at)ip9(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SKIP LOCKED DATA (work in progress)
Date: 2014-07-29 01:35:12
Message-ID: 20140729013511.GP5475@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Rowley wrote:

> I've also been looking at the isolation tests and I see that you've added a
> series of tests for NOWAIT. I was wondering why you did that as that's
> really existing code, probably if you thought the tests were a bit thin
> around NOWAIT then maybe that should be a separate patch?

The isolation tester is new so we don't have nearly enough tests for it.
Adding more meaningful tests is good even if they're unrelated to the
patch at hand.

FWIW you can use configure --enable-coverage and "make coverage-html" to
get coverage reports.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-07-29 01:38:41 Re: [w32] test_shm_mq test suite permanently burns connections slots
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-07-29 01:29:48 Re: SKIP LOCKED DATA (work in progress)