Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
Cc: Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jim Mlodgenski <jimmy76(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API
Date: 2014-07-17 15:02:27
Message-ID: 20140717150227.GL11811@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I haven't followed this at all, but I just skimmed over it and noticed
the CustomPlanMarkPos thingy; apologies if this has been discussed
before. It seems a bit odd to me; why isn't it sufficient to have a
boolean flag in regular CustomPlan to indicate that it supports
mark/restore?

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Johnny Billquist 2014-07-17 15:04:49 Re: PostgreSQL for VAX on NetBSD/OpenBSD
Previous Message Greg Stark 2014-07-17 14:53:30 Re: PostgreSQL for VAX on NetBSD/OpenBSD