| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Allowing NOT IN to use ANTI joins |
| Date: | 2014-07-13 14:27:22 |
| Message-ID: | 20140713142722.GA21370@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-07-13 23:06:15 +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> I had another look at this and it appears you were right the first time, we
> need to ensure there's no NULLs on both sides of the join condition.
The patch is currently marked as 'ready for committer' - that doesn't
seem to correspond to the discussion. Marked as 'Waiting for Author'. Ok?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-07-13 15:00:34 | Re: Allowing NOT IN to use ANTI joins |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2014-07-13 11:06:15 | Re: Allowing NOT IN to use ANTI joins |