BUG #10823: Better REINDEX syntax.

From: dmigowski(at)ikoffice(dot)de
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: BUG #10823: Better REINDEX syntax.
Date: 2014-07-01 10:33:07
Message-ID: 20140701103307.15691.5420@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

The following bug has been logged on the website:

Bug reference: 10823
Logged by: Daniel Migowski
Email address: dmigowski(at)ikoffice(dot)de
PostgreSQL version: 9.1.13
Operating system: n/a
Description:

Hello.

Compared to CLUSTER and VACUUM FULL we need to specify a database to the
REINDEX command. Why? It would be logical to reindex the current database,
exactly like CLUSTER does. So why isn't the DATABASE parameter optional?

PS: Thanks for all your work on this great database!

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2014-07-01 11:48:10 Re: BUG #10822: "ALTER SYSTEM cannot run inside a transaction block" when having autocommit disabled.
Previous Message feikesteenbergen 2014-07-01 09:52:59 BUG #10822: "ALTER SYSTEM cannot run inside a transaction block" when having autocommit disabled.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-07-01 10:40:58 Re: better atomics - v0.5
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2014-07-01 10:25:46 Re: WAL replay bugs