Re: ALTER SYSTEM RESET?

From: Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de>
To: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ALTER SYSTEM RESET?
Date: 2014-06-28 17:08:49
Message-ID: 20140628170849.GA5808@msg.df7cb.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Re: Vik Fearing 2014-06-27 <53AD15F7(dot)2060506(at)dalibo(dot)com>
> On 06/27/2014 08:49 AM, Vik Fearing wrote:
> > This third patch reformats the documentation in the way I expected it to
> > be committed.
>
> Amit,
>
> I added this to the next commitfest with your name as reviewer.
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1495
>
> Please update the status as you see fit.

Isn't this 9.4 material? It seems like an oversight in the ALTER
SYSTEM implementation, and people will be expecting "ALTER SYTEM
(RE)SET guc" to just work like "(RE)SET guc".

It was mentioned by Alvaro there:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20130802173458.GO5669@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org

Christoph
--
cb(at)df7cb(dot)de | http://www.df7cb.de/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matheus de Oliveira 2014-06-28 18:19:42 Re: How about a proper TEMPORARY TABLESPACE?
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-06-28 16:36:39 Re: better atomics - v0.5