| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 9.5 CF1 |
| Date: | 2014-06-17 17:32:16 |
| Message-ID: | 20140617173215.GI18688@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> I find it hard to believe that gmail is incapable of threading messages
> using In-Reply-To/References header fields, especially given that mail
> subjects are changed all the time in the normal course of events. But
> I'll take your word for it and reply to the original message (as I've
> always done) without changing the Subject for any reviews I post.
They do it -- I experimented with it awhile ago. Gmail threads emails
perfectly well, but it seems they break threads on purpose when the
subject changes. Apparently, more people is used to starting a new
thread by replying to an existing email and changing to a new subject,
than people "tweak" subjects by adding tags and such.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-06-17 17:55:09 | Re: Atomics hardware support table & supported architectures |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-06-17 17:14:26 | Re: Atomics hardware support table & supported architectures |